Pushing Buttons

FROM THE WEB ON THE YAHOO GROUP HUMAN ETHOLOGY
Names have been ***** out

Comments in BLUE are from Rich Shull host of Blog Pre Rain Man Autism

*************: Essentially the test allows the viewer to push the space bar of a laptop computer. Each time the space bar is pushed, a new visual image comes on the screen. The person viewing the image is to rate the image on the keypad between 1 and 7, based on how erotic the image is. A "1" is not erotic at all and "7" is highly erotic. The test is trying to determine the age and gender of individuals towards whom one is sexually attracted. Early not out of the closet autisitcs might well
experience a longer delay as they might well be attracted to a same sex person
and then have to think and read just their clicks- especially if they are not out
and live in a homophobic environment.
What the viewer does not realize (unless they looked at the web site in the second link above) is that the computer is actually measuring viewing time, meaning the number of seconds the slide is on before the space bar is pushed. The numbers that one is entering into the key pad are irrelevant! One tends to look at pictures longer that are more pleasing and pleasurable. MORE Irrelevance! Autisitc versed in picture thoughts the sub routine
of invisable picutre based thoughts might well have figured out a different thought
process than the "experts" are not even aware of measuring, in effect they are measuring
nothing at all
. EVERY autuisitc person has a very unique picture thought dictionary, based on life
experence so naturally it might or might not ring a bell with us. I am talking about
Picture thoughts the probable sub routine all humans do, and proficient picture
thinkers have figured out. Our version of autism might well be the building blocks of the
Human mind. Given the above method, one could ask an autistic person to rate How pleasant various faces are on a key pad on a 1 to 7 scale. At the same time, one could measure their viewing time. What would vary in the faces would be eye contact. The expert MISS The Point to Autism Again!
IF OUR Eyes ARE OFF- lack of Contact- it only means our brains are trying to think
In pictures the invisible sub daydream type thoughts we do to think with. Missing Eye
Contact for us only means our brains work differently from yours. IF we figure out our picture
Thoughts, we can finally figure out enough of your thoughts for normal eye contact. If our
brains are on , our hearing and optic vision are OFF for typically a few milliseconds or so.Not
only do we not give eye contact we miss lots of other social clues. Of Course Old time
Autistic MISSING The CURSE Of modern Autism out grew our autism and learned the sub thoughts
Needed to mimic traditional thought. The same face can be shown with direct eye contact and also looking away. All of the faces would be strangers and the faces would not change their eye contact on the computer screen. Depending on what such an experiment showed (between autistics and neurotypicals), one could run another experiment in which the faces were familiar, such as family members but also with direct eye contact and looking away. Perhaps some day once Autism Admits to the rest
of us that don't deflate the new autism empire they can do this same experiment with
proficient picture thinkers that do more than Temple wrote about and with other autistic
and see the difference there. I suspect a proficient picture thinker will nearly score equally
with a normal thinker. Autism after all just seems to be the building blocks of the mind
all figured out. Our autisitc one are Savants and normal peoples thoughts, only thing
is we have boken the code of human thought.

There may even be a way to put such a test on the internet on the same web page as your Aspie Quiz, at least the first portion with the anonymous faces.**********: OK, so I tested the hypothesis that autistics would view faces for a shorter period of time than neurotypicals, and filled up the test with other images just to see that there weren't any differences there either. The hypothesis is not supported with N=293 (http://www.rdos.net/eng/aspeval/imgrate1.htm). Instead, the view-time of the autistic group is slightly longer for all human faces (none of these have p < style="color:#3333ff;">See what happens when NORMALS try to
Figure out autistic? They work from the point of view we should be normal- like them-
They have no way of knowing or figuring out that autism is an entirely different human
Thought process that is both MR/DD and Einstein . Autism research is NOT at all keen
on its high functioning Anthropology, they will not admit to us despite knowing of us, we
Unintentionally deflate their ignorance. In this case sadly when we do figure out
Thought process and it mimics a normal persons we really do see that we came up
from the bottom of the gene pool. What highly degreed proper researchers with a good job
to keep and an empire to fund and papers to publish will never see the points we make-
they are too obvious and they will not stoop that low.

If autism Research were for real it would have no trouble admitting to ALL autistic
even the old ones and those that have figured out autism and have been banished
From Autism circles. It 's a shame Autism was a made a fool by the late Dr Rimalnd.
It is a bigger shame, the resulting autism curse is based in a cure and Autism doesn't need
Cured it needs explained. No amout of research not asking the right questions will ever find an
answer- maybe they designed the Autism Empire that way? If not, Ignorance is certianly the most effective tool man has never known.

Rich Shull on the blog Autism Pre Rain Man Autism,

Author Autism Pre Rain Man Autism, Built on Thinking in Pictures and inventor of the Turing Motor a 70% Efficient Green Car Motor. (triple hybrid)